Blog

  • A Day in an Afghan School

    By Fariba Nawa
    September 2004
    Scholastic

    (view article with photos at scholastic.com)

    Elham stands tall, all three feet of him, to read a lesson from his book in front of his fourth-grade class. His gleaming blue eyes pass quickly over the pages.

    Class takes place inside a tent with no seats or desks. A washed-out blackboard stands in the corner. A square was cut in the tent to create a window overlooking mountains and a fast-flowing river.

    Elham attends School Number One, in the northeast province of Badakhshan, with about 3,000 classmates. He can say, “What is your name?” and “My name is Elham,” in English. He writes his name in Dari, an Afghan language, and his teacher praises his handwriting.

    School Number One is a typical school in Afghanistan. There are hundreds of schools in Badakhshan and thousands in the entire country. The schools have few supplies. Fourth-graders learn from first-grade books. Many schools have been built in the past four years, but few have enough teachers, chairs, or classrooms.

    A Religious Education

    At School Number One, located in the province’s capital Fayzabad, boys study with girls until the seventh grade. Then, they are transferred to an all-boys school. They won’t study with girls again until they reach university.

    Amina Hafizi, 15, attends School Number One in the morning and teaches the Koran, the Muslim holy book, in the afternoon. She has memorized all 30 verses of the Koran’s sacred text and aids her students in reading the Arabic language and memorizing it. (The Koran is written in Arabic and Muslims are encouraged to read it in its original language.)

    “My favorite subjects are in religion and science. I like religious history, physics, and geometry,” Amina says shyly. When asked what she wants to study in college, she says she had not thought that far ahead.

    That is not surprising, since most of the students do not have the resources to study beyond 12th grade. To go to university, Amina would have to travel to the capital, Kabul, a grueling 16-hour drive through jagged mountain passes.

    Slow and Steady

    At School Number One, there’s not enough room to house all the elementary and high school students at once. So high school classes are scheduled for four hours in the morning, and elementary school classes for four hours in the afternoon, six days a week. The students take winters off because it’s too hard to trudge through the snow.

    “We make the best of what we have right now,” says school principal Pari Gul Darwishyar.

    Today, as Elham finishes his story, it is summer. Students and teachers endure 100-degree heat in the tents. They can hear the water as it crashes on the river rocks. Only a rare breeze cools their sweat. A girl in the third grade now stands to read the story of the hare and tortoise, as her classmates repeat every word, following along in their book.

  • Life in a Village

    By Fariba Nawa
    September 2004
    Scholastic

    (view article with photos at scholastic.com)

    In the northeast of Afghanistan is a village called Yaftal, built along the edge of a mountain thousands of feet high. In the summer, it is windy and sunny. In the winter, it snows and only the men in the family dare to leave the village to find work.

    Yaftal is home to 15-year-old Hasiba, who lives a hard and busy life. Her father is a farmer and her mother a homemaker. She lives in a two-bedroom, mud-brick shack with her two sisters and four brothers. Their kitchen, which has no door or window, has a portable gas stove and a clay oven the family has built into the ground to bake bread. They have one pot and a tea kettle visible in the kitchen. Their bathroom is a hole in the ground.

    Daily Routine

    Every day, Hasiba wakes up at 5 a.m. with the rest of her family. She and her two sisters carry empty oil cans to the spring five minutes away. They fill the cans with water to use for the rest of the day. Then she sweeps off the dust in front of her house, which is on the edge of a cliff. She rolls up her bed, washes, and sits down with the family to have breakfast. Wheat bread and tea with milk and sugar is their morning diet. Hasiba puts on her black uniform, braids her long, brown hair into several strands, and wraps her head with a sheer, black scarf. She puts on her tattered shoes and begins her two-hour walk downhill to school.

    At 8 a.m., she reaches her school on the rim of the Kokcha River. She is one of the best students in her seventh-grade class. Hasiba and more than 100 other students cram into a windowless classroom to study math, science, English, and literature.

    “My favorite subjects are English and math. I want to be a teacher,” Hasiba says shyly.

    School ends at noon and Hasiba and her siblings begin their journey home, a three-hour walk uphill. They have bread and water in their backpacks to eat on the way home. At 3 p.m., Hasiba reaches home exhausted, her feet blistered. She rests for a few minutes before her mother serves lunch: tea with milk and sugar, and rice or bread.

    From Student to Teacher

    At 4 p.m., Hasiba goes to work—without pay—as a literacy teacher for six older women who cannot read. She doesn’t go far this time—the village women come to her house to learn. Her course is part of a larger program for women who are illiterate, or cannot read. With a small blackboard and chalk, she teaches them the Persian alphabet. People in this part of Afghanistan speak Dari, a dialect of Persian. One of her students is her mother.

    “I’m so happy that Hasiba can teach all of us. I don’t want her to get married so she can continue her education,” her mother says. If Hasiba married, she would most likely become a mom and have little time to learn or teach.

    At 6 p.m., Hasiba finishes teaching and cooks dinner with her mother. They eat rice or soup. Hasiba does homework for an hour. At 9 p.m., she lays out a sponge mat next to her siblings, and falls into a deep sleep.

  • One Brick at a Time

    The reconstruction of Fayzabad
    By Fariba Nawa
    September 2004
    Scholastic

    (view article with photos at scholastic.com)

    From the plane, Fayzabad looks beautiful, with green mountains and a white-water river dividing the new and old sections of the city. But on the ground, there is not much to see.

    There are no paved roads, electricity, proper hospital, or telephone service. Most of the 20,000 residents make their money or find their food by farming or shopkeeping. Fayzabad has always been a poor and pretty place. Slowly, it is becoming a modern city.

    Reconstruction in Afghanistan’s major cities is moving forward slowly because there are still security problems. But compared to four years ago when the Taliban was in power, much has changed for the better. The main Afghan cities have mobile telephone services, schools are being built for boys and girls and the basic standard of living is improving. More people seem to have housing, water, and electricity. Many have traded in their donkeys for cars.

    The bad news is that much of the money for these improvements is made illegally. Many farmers grow opium, which is used to make heroin, a dangerous drug that is illegal throughout the world. Some farmers use the money they make from selling opium to rebuild bombed-out roads and destroyed water dams.

    There are also legal reconstruction projects in the city. Many international aid organizations are helping people. The organization FOCUS Humanitarian Assistance builds roads and gives the workers who build them food for their service.

    “Building roads has been a great benefit to the people because they never had roads,” said Islamuddin Umidi, the deputy projects coordinator for FOCUS. “We’re giving them access to markets, health centers, and other cities.”

    The World Health Organization connected water taps to mountain springs so that people have access to clean water on every street corner. And the United Nations Children’s Fund is giving children school supplies and vaccines.

    These and other humanitarian projects do not guarantee that the country will grow and become rich. Afghanistan needs peace and security first. But the optimistic Afghans say that the little steps to rebuilding, like the few streets and water taps in Fayzabad, are just the beginning of a long road to reconstruction.

  • Women in Afghanistan

    More freedom doesn’t mean more equality
    By Fariba Nawa
    September 2004
    Scholastic

    (view article with photos at scholastic.com)

    Farzana Wahedi was 14 years old when a stranger hit her for not covering her face. In Afghanistan under the Taliban, it was a crime for a woman to bare any part of her body except her hands.

    Now, six years later, Wahedi is a successful news photographer. The Taliban has been replaced by a government that allows women their basic freedoms. Wahedi no longer wears a burqa, a flowing garment with only little holes to see through. Yet even with all the changes, she and many other women like her say they are in danger and treated unfairly in Afghanistan.

    “We still don’t feel safe, of course,” says Wahedi.

    Safia Melad, a 28-year-old journalist for the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, says that life for Afghan women is much harder than it is for American women.

    “We have to be aware of how we dress, who we talk to, where we go, what we do all the time so that people don’t ruin our family reputation and honor,” says Melad. “I don’t think I will ever be treated as an equal here.”

    She likes being a journalist and has appeared on television as an announcer, but some Afghans believe a woman should not be so free. Some neighbors have insulted her for her choice of lifestyle.

    But Melad thanks God that the Taliban is gone. Taliban officials had arrested her husband for seven months and kept her inside the house for six years. She used that time to raise her two children, but she also became depressed and anxious.

    Her coworker, Lailuma Sadid, also raised her little girl, Oranoos, during the Taliban period. Sadid, 25, was in her first year of journalism school in college when the Taliban took power. She had to drop out and stay home. Under the Taliban, women were forbidden to attend school, work with men, or even walk around with men who weren’t related to them.

    “I felt as a woman I had no power or life of my own. They controlled us,” Sadid says.

    But after the Taliban was overthrown, she went back to college and got her degree. She has been working as a journalist covering politics and interviewing diplomats and ministers. She says her entire life got better after the Taliban. “I have almost every freedom I could want right now.”

  • Iraq’s boy band dreams big

    By Fariba Nawa
    September 2003
    Scholastic

    Baghdad — Five boys with a keyboard and a Volkswagen Passat. That’s all it took to form Unknown to No One, Iraq’s one and only boy band. Wide-eyed and ambitious, the boys represent the ethnic and religious mixture of Iraq. And a new spirit.

    Nadeem Hamid, 20; Art Haroutuanian, 26; Shant Garabitian, 25; Hassan Ali, 20; and Diar Dullair, 21, came together three years ago and began producing English pop songs in Baghdad. They didn’t make it big with an Iraqi audience. But the boys are taking advantage of the world’s attention on their country to promote their unique status. They want to hit the pop charts in the West.

    “You say this is just another boy band. But we’re an Iraqi boy band. How many of those are there?” says Nadeem, one of the lead singers.

    Their energy and spirit is refreshing among the worn-out, war-weary attitudes of Iraqi youth.

    The boys are making a big splash with the media in Baghdad. They have been featured on most major TV news programs and on the print news services. The hip boys of Baghdad are anticipating stardom. Peter Whitehead, a British talent scout, has promised to promote their music. Barry Mason, the songwriter who penned Tom Jones’ Delilah, has offered to write a song for them.

    “I want to prove myself as an Iraqi person. We want to introduce Baghdad to the world through our eyes,” says Shant, one of the band’s creators.

    With the help of their Iraqi manager, Alan Enwya, Unknown to No One produced its first album, From Now On. The favorite song among their listeners is “Hey Girl,” a melodious confession of love and heartache. In the tradition of boy bands, their songs are actually all about love and girls.

    Art writes the songs (he wrote his first song as an army troop in training camp). They compose their music on a keyboard, which they leave in the trunk of their Volkswagen. The car is their rehearsal stage. The bachelors all live with their families—single men and women in the Middle East normally do not have their own place until they get married. Their families believe the boys are unrealistic dreamers.

    “They say ‘Go and find a real job. Who’s going to feed your wife tomorrow,”’ Art says, and the other boys chuckle and nod their heads. “We have real jobs, but we want more.”

    Art is a civil servant in the ministry of trade; Shant is a goldsmith; Nadeem, Hassan, and Diar are university students. Art and Shant are Armenian Christians; Nadeem and Hassan are Shiite Muslims, and Diar is a Kurdish Sunni. They could be the poster children for the diversity of Iraq.

    The band was the brainchild of Art and Shant. They advertised for vocalists and recruited the other three into the band.

    “I saw his songs and Art heard my voice and it was as if we had been waiting for each other all our lives,” Nadeem says.

    But promoting an English-singing band under a dictatorship has its hazards. The group could not get any of their songs to air on Iraqi radio unless they sang for the regime. So Art wrote a piece praising Saddam on his birthday and they forced themselves to sing it on the air. The hymn was replayed on the hour on the Voice of Youth radio program.

    Then an American reporter interviewed their manager, Enwya, for a story on the band, and the secret police took him in for questioning. Iraqis were not allowed to speak to foreigners.

    Now they feel free and on top of the world and soon hope to be at the top of the charts.

    The boys say for Iraqis, this is the time to dream. The collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime is giving Iraqis an opportunity to express themselves.

  • Brides of the drug lords

    Afghanistan’s opium trade is worth £14 billion a year. But when its dealers are shot or jailed, their daughters are sold as wives to settle their debts

    Aziza Khoshsaraj, a 12-year-old opium bride

    By Fariba Nawa
    May 9, 2004
    Sunday Times Magazine (UK)

    Aziza’s pale-green eyes flashed. Her 12-year-old body shivered. She took two steps back towards the mud wall in the hallway. It was a dead end. “I’m not going! I’m not going!” she shouted at her mother. Meanwhile, Haji Sufi, a 46-year-old opium farmer, waited for her, cross-legged on a thin mat, drinking black tea. He had travelled hundreds of kilometres from southern Afghanistan to collect Aziza, his wife of two years. She was his payment for taking on her father’s £2,656 opium debt. But every time he came, Aziza cursed him and ran off.

    Aziza’s mother, Khadija, scowled at her daughter. “It’s your wretched father’s fault that has put us in this hell,” she said. “What’s done is done.”

    Since the Taliban fell in 2001, Afghanistan’s once-regulated opium trade has been up for grabs by anyone with weapons and land. The United Nations estimates that 500,000 people are involved in the trafficking chain, and the overall turnover of illicit international trade in Afghan opiates is worth £14 billion a year. The globe’s largest opium producer, Afghanistan feeds two-thirds of the world’s demand for narcotics.

    The trade is a formidable barrier to western efforts to reconstruct the country. About half its GDP comes from it, hindering efforts to build a legal economy. Western officials also fear it is helping to fund terrorism. But the war against drugs is as shadowy as the war against terrorism, with no defined enemy or borders or end in sight. The British have poured millions of pounds into trying to stop the trade, with little success. Many of those who benefit the most are the same people who now run Afghanistan’s provinces, with western support.

    Opium production shot up from 185 tonnes in 2001 to 3,600 tonnes in 2003; 28 of the 32 provinces now harvest poppies. About half the opium leaves through the western border to Iran, on to Turkey and the Gulf, where it is refined into heroin and sent to Europe and beyond. Donor countries are sceptical about aiding a narcotics-producing state, but they rarely take into account the tragedies at the source of the problem.

    Aziza’s home is in one of hundreds of villages forming links in the chain. Ghorian district is in Herat province, two hours from the Iranian border. Many of its 180,000 residents are drug addicts, dealers or widows. Drug lords rule, aided by a weak and corrupt local government. Husbands and sons carry opium by foot and donkey over the mountains, where they come under fire from Iranian border guards. Many never return, having been either killed in ambushes or executed in Iranian prisons. They leave behind thousands of pounds of opium debts, which are inherited by the trade’s greatest victims: women and children.

    Aziza Khoshsaraj is the neighbourhood’s fair-skinned, 5ft-tall imp. To the dismay of her mother, she often plays barefoot in the creek. She is ecstatic that she can go to school after six years at home during Taliban rule. But the carefree girl becomes a raging, terrified child when Sufi arrives, bearing gifts. Her mother, Khadija, is so poor she tries to convince her to go. She wants the entire family to become Sufi’s servants, to ensure their livelihood.

    Once, it was all very different. Khadija, 30, and her daughters say little about their old home, a 10-room house with a rose garden, or the kilos of gold jewellery that once hung from their necks and ears. But everybody else in Ghorian remembers. “Few here had that kind of wealth,” said Safia Hussein, a woman from the same tribe.

    Aziza’s father, Maroof Khoshsaraj, 35, was an opium recruiter, the intermediary between the couriers and kingpins. He made his small fortune buying opium and sending young men to their deaths. In five years, he built a two-storey home. He also took a second wife, Shamira, a young city girl; on their wedding day, Maroof decorated almost every Land Cruiser in town with flowers.

    But opium wealth is fleeting. Iran has tightened its border, partly because of its rising population of opium addicts. Few Afghan couriers return, and the opium just disappears with them. Maroof owed about £5,800. The drug barons held a gun to his head and threw him in jail several times, demanding their money. He didn’t have it, so he offered them his two daughters, Aziza and Rahima, 14. Their fair skin and curvaceous figures made the girls worth thousands of pounds. Two years ago, Maroof went into hiding, leaving his first wife, Khadija, pregnant with her sixth child. Then came the drug barons. They gave the family a few hours to pack, and then they took the house and everything that was left in it. Maroof’s second wife returned to the city with her two children to live with her parents. He has also been seen in the markets there, skinning sheep.

    Khadija and her children, aged between one and 14, became homeless. Now she lives in a two-room shack belonging to a cousin in Iran. There’s a charred kitchen and an outside toilet. Khadija serves others now, making 12p to 20p a day baking bread or washing clothes. The family barely has enough to eat. They have two outfits each, a pair of shoes, a few headscarves. Her eldest daughter’s husband has not shown up, but Khadija is too afraid to wed her to another man in case he does.

    Khadija is gaunt and listless. When she is not working she sits motionless, smoking her water pipe; nearly all her teeth are gone. She speaks with fatalistic absolutism: life and God have cursed her. “I live hour by hour, wondering where the next meal is coming from, when are the smugglers going to take my daughters, is my husband ever going to come home. We have peace now, but what good is it when my family may go hungry tomorrow?” she asked, nursing her youngest.

    Some here believe that Herat city, an oasis in the province also called Herat, will one day be destroyed by the fierce wind that cools it during summers when the temperature reaches 40 degrees. Genghis Khan razed Herat province in the 13th century, but it re-emerged 200 years later as central Asia’s cradle of art and culture. Today it is Afghanistan’s wealthiest region, thanks to customs revenues from imports. But Ghorian is on the edge of destruction. Thirty years ago, before the communists seized control, it was a bastion of tea and fabric smuggling, but only a small amount of opium was traded. Residents lived on agriculture. During the 1979-1992 war against the Soviet-backed regime, many of Ghorian’s men joined the resistance and hundreds of families fled to Iran.

    Farmers in the south and east of Afghanistan turned from wheat to poppies to help fund the resistance. Ghorian’s nomads, with their tradition of smuggling, handled the opium-trafficking to Iran. After the communists fell, the refugees returned and the only jobs were in the drug trade. What was once a business for a few select families became a source of income for half the district.

    Demand rose. Iran, with more than a million addicts, became a big consumer of Afghan opium, as did Europe. In 1995 the Taliban seized Herat and encouraged the trade, collecting taxes from opium farmers and smugglers. Then a long drought killed animals and the shepherds’ livelihood. Many in the area had no skills or literacy, so even shopkeepers began selling opium. At first nobody in Ghorian knew how to grow poppies, then the Taliban brought their opium farmers from the south to show how it was done.

    Jalal, 19, learnt from the Taliban how to turn his wheat and watermelon fields into poppy flowers. His family’s half-acre yielded 20 kilos of raw opium last year, the first time he’d cultivated it. “My father asked me if I wanted a wife and a car,” said Jalal. “I said I want two cars. I now transport passengers for $20 return from Ghorian to Herat city. I had nothing, not even a bicycle last year. Now I feel rich and I have a job.”

    On the way to his best friend’s house, Jalal stopped to greet some men. One offered him eight kilos of opium for his car. Jalal eyed the station wagon’s steering wheel like a toddler with a new toy. “I just got this and I can’t give it up for less than 10 kilos. Let’s talk later,” he said, accelerating.

    Jalal’s best friend is Tarek, a chubby, moustached 23-year-old who manages dozens of acres of land belonging to families living abroad. This year he planted opium on that land and now has enough money for his wedding. He bought a shiny Honda motorcycle and painted his mud-brick house white. Over green tea, Tarek brought out his fresh batch of black opium, a bitter, gooey liquid. “If you sell, you don’t use it. We have people who test to see if it’s pure. They’re addicts,” he said.

    Unless desperate, they won’t do the border run themselves. “We deal here and hire the shepherds as our fall guys. This is the only way to stay alive and get rich,” Jalal said with a smug smile.

    They like the new government. The district administration sends a six-member commission to view the cultivated land in the autumn, said Jalal, and it asks for a kilo per acre. In exchange, crops are not destroyed. The trade-off is blatant. While I was there, Jalal sat in the Ghorian police station with the assistant intelligence director. “I’m upset with your father,” the official said. “He didn’t give me my share. I expect my share.”

    The conversation halted when Mohammad Sobhan, the district intelligence chief, arrived. He offered to show videos of the government destroying opium crops. “When families don’t want to give a cut, the government eliminates their crop,” Jalal explained later. Sobhan, who has since resigned, admitted the administration was soft on drug lords for political reasons but denied collaboration with farmers and smugglers. He said smugglers escaped to Zir Koh, a nearby district under a different ruler, where criminals cannot be prosecuted. But he agreed officials don’t have the manpower and weapons to fight traffickers.

    It’s clear that neither government officials nor the police are trusted. The police chief had just weeded out a handful of hashish plants from a local farm and was burning them in public as an example. The watching crowd’s mood was cynical. “They probably kept most of it hidden in the fort to sell later,” a bystander whispered.

    The Taliban banned opium production in 2000. Prices ÿhad dropped too low and they wanted to get rid of their stockpiles. All that changed when the American-led coalition triumphed: farmers took advantage of the power vacuum. President Hamid Karzai made the drug business illegal in January 2002, but the American-backed leader’s authority does not reach far beyond the capital, Kabul.

    In Herat, the warlord Ismail Khan is the self-proclaimed emir, with an army of 20,000 soldiers backed by Iran. President Karzai has tried several times to lure him to Kabul, without success. Khan had prohibited the central Afghan anti-narcotics office from opening a branch in his fiefdom, saying there is already a bureau operating under his control. But recently, the two agencies merged and Khan is working with the central government on eradicating drugs. Publicly, he condemns the drug trade and supports a treatment clinic for the region’s booming number of addicts. If he is reaping the benefits of opium-trafficking, the evidence is hard to find. Still, suspicions about him remain. Though tight security means Herat is Afghanistan’s most peaceful province, trafficking continues. Khan, a Tajik, is said to dislike Ghorian, which is mostly Pashtun and has a reputation for revolt. He appointed a district mayor and police chief from outside to strengthen Tajik power and, two years ago, he had a Pashtun smuggler shot and killed. But even Ismail Khan can’t control the area.

    “We don’t get any government help here — we’re the armpit of the province. We’re considered the smugglers and thieves,” said Dr Gol Ahmed Daanish, head of the local hospital. “Smuggling is the only income that has been encouraged.” Daanish, elegant in his western slacks and shirt, represents the small minority of educated residents who are fighting to change the district’s reputation. “It was run by a few locals who are now dead or addicted,” he said. “Now there are invisible drug mafias and bandits who control the trade, and people here have become the pawns.”

    The most feared drug lords here are two cousins, Ruhollah and Kader. Their twin two-storey houses, with well-kept gardens and locked brass gates, tower over rows of dilapidated mud homes. They hail from a smaller village, Haft Chah, which breeds drug dealers with important Iranian connections, say townspeople. Ruhollah and Kader are illiterate hajis — they made the obligatory trip to Mecca three years ago. Ghorian residents respect them for that title and their rise to affluence. They were shepherds, then refugees working on construction jobs in Iran; now they’re the closest thing to mafia. Their cronies terrorise women and families with opium debts.

    Yet even they have lost people close to them to drugs. Ruhollah, 35, supports the families of two siblings, since their men died smuggling narcotics. He agreed to an interview on the condition that he would not talk about his smuggling activities. Inside his spotless seven-bedroom house, the whispers of his wives and extended family echoed from behind closed doors. Ruhollah sat on a gleaming Persian carpet next to his adopted daughter, Soghra, 10, who was sporting sunglasses.

    “This route has belonged to smugglers through Afghanistan’s history,” he said. “It’s not a crime. People do it because they are hungry.” He claimed his family made their money from sheep-herding and money exchanges; locals claim it’s a front for their drug business. He said his fortune was worth only £12,000. He was friends with the Taliban and is now friends with the new, coalition-backed government. “My family has been able to adapt to government changes.” He is said to have taken over from the original opium-trafficking clan, the Soltanzi. They knew the mountain and desert passes of the old Silk Road blindfolded, and nobody dared stop them. But as Iran toughened its stance, the clan lost its authority and income. Its women are now under Ruhollah’s power.

    In Shau Bibi Soltanzi’s three-room mud house, the light shines on a photograph of her husband, Shahpoor, and her son Qader, both executed in an Iranian prison 11 years ago. Her eldest son, Kader, died in battle against the Soviets. Her son Nader was captured by the Iranians and has left her with a huge opium debt. Her other son, Wahid, is a drug addict in Iran. She has not put up pictures of her daughters because it’s not proper to display women’s photos. But she has a photograph of her youngest daughter, Bibi Shah, in a clear plastic bag. The 17-year-old died three years ago in her mother’s home. She had poured cooking gas on herself and lit a match. She died two months later, moaning in agony from her injuries.

    Bibi Shah’s husband was killed carting opium. Her two brothers-in-law both offered to marry her, according to tradition, but she refused. Her in-laws accused her of wanting to remarry for a dowry, and her mother says they beat her until they tore her eardrum. They locked her up in the house and would not let her family see her. She kept a knife under her pillow when she slept, afraid that her brothers-in-law would rape her. One day, Bibi Shah lost hope completely.

    Her mother — left only with her other daughter, Gulaby, also a widow with two small sons — is losing her mind. She is often not able to articulate a coherent thought. She and Gulaby borrow the equivalent of 60p to buy four kilos of wool, spinning it into yarn for carpets. It takes 10 days and they sell the yarn for £1. They spend 15p a day, including their diet of onions, bread and dried curds. Shau Bibi, in her chador and her tattered shoes, searches for thorn and hay in the desert, which she sells to shepherds as fodder and fuel for a few pence. And now she has started growing opium in her yard in order to survive. Her family had long transported the drug.

    “We didn’t make much money in the old days. For a kilo the men took across the border, they got a sack of flour. Now the stakes are higher and so is the cost to your life.” Her son Nader, 24, was well known as a ruthless dealer. Shau Bibi wanted him to stop and convinced him to get engaged. The bride’s family demanded a £2,300 dowry. Nader made the dangerous trip himself to earn it and pay his debts. It was three years before Shau Bibi received news that Iranians had caught him alive — with three dead cohorts. Now she owed southern Afghan dealers and Ruhollah £4,600. “They were Taliban; they came and took the carpets, motorcycle, prayer rugs and the land. Haji Ruhollah left me with nothing,” she wept. Khan, Herat’s governor, has said that all opium debts are forgiven, but Shau Bibi’s creditors keep coming. Some are police, she said. On Friday, the Islamic holy day, she goes to the cemetery and grieves at the unmarked graves of Bibi Shah and Kader.

    Shau Bibi said she knew why the government didn’t act against Ruhollah and his cousin Kader. “Everyone knows these two terrorise and control Ghorian. Why don’t they put them in jail? Because they can’t. They have more money and power than Ismail Khan and Karzai. Or else the government cannot survive without them and their money.”

    The US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said in September that he did not know how the United States would tackle Afghanistan becoming a drug state that funded coalition opponents. Britain’s 10-year counter-narcotics strategy includes law enforcement, alternative crop options and reduction of demand. But critics say both countries, by commending warlords who engage in the trade but who also support the coalition, weaken international efforts to stamp it out. In early 2002, Britain compensated farmers by £200 an acre for eliminating opium crops. Boxes of cash — £21.25m in all — were flown into the east and south, and distributed to local authorities. About 4,500 acres of poppy harvest were destroyed. But, according to the Dutch-based Transnational Institute, which studies drugs in Afghanistan, many district governors pocketed the money instead, and farmers continued to plant poppies.

    New anti-drug laws have been passed and Mirwais Yasini, director of the anti-narcotics office, claims a reduction in the southern poppy belt as a result. President Karzai’s recent reshuffling of ministers and governors is also an effort to root out drug traders. But halting trafficking is the hardest challenge because its dynamics and criminal networks are unknown to authorities, said Adam Bouloukos of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime. Increasingly, smugglers are avoiding Iran and passing through Tajikistan instead because of its lax security.

    Iran has lost at least 3,000 troops in its fight against trafficking in the past decade. It has added another 25 specialist border patrols to the 100,000 troops already along the 925-kilometre frontier. Traffickers say the troops shoot to kill. On the Afghan side at one checkpoint, three sleepy-eyed guards emerged from a bombed-out barrack. Each carried a rifle, but said they had no communication devices, no vehicle, not even binoculars. In two years, they have only caught five men, carrying just 10 kilos. However, they denied collusion, claiming the route was watched too carefully by Iranians for traffickers to pass.

    Two hundred yards away was the Iranian border post, with armed guards on all four sides, scouting the vast desert through binoculars. Beyond a large, bullet-pocked black stone, the border marker, is Iran and its paved roads and electricity poles. The Iranians are on orders to shoot anything moving past the foot-long rock, and there was a row recently when they shot sheep at night. “We told them the sheep don’t understand borders,” said Khan Mohammed, an Afghan soldier. “They say they have to follow orders.”

    A retired smuggler, Nasim Siah, 32, knows how dangerous his old profession is. Of 21 of his trafficking allies, he is the only one who is free and alive. He began smuggling when he wanted to marry for a second time. The girl’s father asked for a £7,000 dowry, and drugs were the fastest way to get it. He borrowed 1,500 kilos of opium and took it to Iran. Twice, other traffickers shot at his crew. They reached the mountain where the opium was to be unloaded. After 30 days, their Iranian contact appeared. Iranian shepherds are go-betweens for Afghan vendors and Iranian buyers; they also serve as Iranian informers. Siah considers himself lucky. He made it back to present the £7,000 to his bride’s father. “I know more than a dozen girls sold to farmers in the south for opium debts and more than a thousand women who have been widowed.” Ghorian residents say the Siah brothers quit trafficking opium because they were losing money; now they rob jewellery stores and moneychangers.

    Anti-drugs campaigners are trying to encourage women to stop their men becoming involved. One day the district mayor gave a fiery speech to 3,000 women gathered at the girls’ high school in Ghorian, and two girls performed a skit about a mother who convinces her son to give up smuggling and addiction. Some of the women cried as they watched, tears of anguish and hope.

    For Aziza, the bartered child bride, hope may be dim. Sufi says he does not want to force her but she will eventually have to go with him. “Here, girls do not have the right to decide who they marry. Her father promised her to me. I will be patient, but I am her husband… My wife is ill and needs help in the house. I expect this girl to help her but she is rebellious. We hope she will change.”

    The Herat government has banned bartering girls for opium debts, but the couple are already married under Islamic law, making an annulment nearly impossible under tribal values.

    After leaving Ghorian, I heard that Aziza came looking for me. She had walked an hour against the wind. “He’s left, but he swore to come back and take me,” she told my hosts. “Please tell her to make him leave me alone.” But I was long gone.

  • Brides of the drug lords (un-edited version)

    By Fariba Nawa

    Aziza’s pale green eyes flashed. Her 12-year-old body shivered. She took two steps back toward the mud wall in the hallway. It was a dead end.

    “I’m not going! I’m not going!” she shouted at her mother.

    Haji Sufi, a 46-year-old opium farmer, waited for her inside the room, sitting cross-legged on a thin mat drinking black tea with cardamom.

    Even though Sufi and Aziza’s family did not speak the same language, the issue was clear. He had travelled hundreds of kilometres from the south to Ghorian to take Aziza, his wife of two years. She was his payment for taking care of her father’s £2,656 opium debt. But every time he came, Aziza cursed her husband and ran away from him.

    Aziza’s father, Maroof Khoshsaraj, was a middleman in the drug trade, the only profitable business in Ghorian district near the Iranian border. But he was deep into debt when he bartered two of his daughters to drug barons. Then he disappeared.

    Aziza looked at me for support but her mother, Khadija, scowled at her daughter and gave me a warning look not to interfere. “It’s your forsaken father’s fault that has put us in this hell. What’s done is done.”

    Since the fall of the Taliban three years ago, what was once a regulated drug monopoly is now controlled by rival warlords, and is up for grabs by anyone with weapons and a piece of land. The United Nations estimates that half a million people are involved in the drug trafficking chain in Afghanistan and the overall turnover of illicit international trade in Afghan opiates is worth £14 billion annually. It has become the globe’s largest opium country and feeds two-thirds of the world’s and Britain’s demand for narcotics.

    The drug trade is a formidable barrier to Western efforts to reconstruct Afghanistan. About half of the country’s GDP is from the illicit drug trade, hindering efforts to build a legal economy. Western officials also fear the drug trade is helping to fund terrorism. But the war against drugs is as shadowy as the war against terrorism, with no defined enemy or borders or end in sight. The British have poured millions of pounds into drug eradication in Afghanistan, with little success. The battle is further complicated by the fact that many of those who benefit the most from the drug trade are the same people who now run Afghanistan’s provinces, with Western support.

    Afghan opium production shot up from 185 tonnes from the last year the Taliban were in power in 2001 to 3,600 tonnes this year. Twenty-eight of the country’s 32 provinces harvest poppy fields. About half of the opium leaves through the western border to Iran and from there it goes to Turkey and the Gulf, where it is refined into heroin and sent to Europe and the rest of the world. Donor countries are sceptical of giving aid to a narco state but they rarely take into account the tragedies at the source of the problem.

    Aziza’s home is one of hundreds of villages that form the links in the drug chain, and have been devastated by it. Ghorian is a dusty district in Herat province, a two-hour drive from the border with Iran. Many of its 180,000 residents are drug addicts, dealers or widows. Drug lords rule the town, aided by a weak and corrupt local government. Husbands and sons carry kilos of opium on foot and donkeys over the mountains, where they come under fire from Iranian border guards. Many never return, either killed in ambushes or executed in Iranian prisons. They leave behind thousands of pounds of opium debt, which is inherited by the greatest victims: the women and children.

    Aziza Khoshsaraj is the second of four girls and two boys, the fair-skinned, five-foot-tall imp of her neighbourhood. To her mother’s dismay who wants her inside the house, Aziza often plays barefoot in the dry creek or in the hot sand, a scarf tied under her chin. She is ecstatic that she can go to school after six years at home during the Taliban regime. But the carefree girl morphs into a raging, terrified child when Sufi arrives. He has come with gifts to take her away several times in the last two years. Her mother tries to convince her to go. Khadija is so destitute that she wants the entire family to become Sufi’s servants to have a livelihood.

    The family knows what it’s like to be on top of the world and at the bottom of its pit. Khadija, 30, and her daughters say little about the marble-floored, 10-room house with the rose garden. They rarely mention the kilos of gold jewellery that hung from their necks and ears. The women try not to recall their motorcycle parked in the driveway. But everybody else in Ghorian remembers well.

    “They were the envy of this town. Few here had that kind of wealth,” Safia Hussein, a woman from the same tribe in Ghorian said.

    Aziza’s father, Maroof Khoshsaraj, 35, was an opium recruiter, the intermediary between the couriers and kingpins. He made his small fortune buying opium and sending young men to their death.

    He wore a Rodo watch, a sign of wealth in Afghanistan, and a gold ring that opened up to sport another smaller watch. In a matter of five years, he built the blue-tiled, two-story home and decided to marry a second time. He wed Shamira, a young girl from the city, and wanted to make her feel like the world was hers. On their wedding day, Maroof decorated almost every Toyota Land Cruiser in town with fresh flowers. With the couple in front, the procession of motorcycles and cars circled the bombed-out roads of Ghorian as guests fired rounds of gunshots into the air to celebrate.

    But opium wealth is as fleeting as its high. Iran has tightened its border partly because of its rising population of opium addicts. Few Afghan couriers return, and the opium disappears with them.

    Maroof owed about £5,800. The drug barons held a gun to his head and threw him in jail several times demanding their money. Maroof did not have assets so he offered his two daughters, Aziza and Rahima, 14. Their fair skin and curvaceous figures made the girls worth thousands of pounds. A year ago, Maroof went into hiding, leaving Khadija pregnant with her sixth child. Then came the drug barons knocking down their doors. They gave the family from morning until the afternoon to pack up. They took the house and everything in it – the Persian carpets, the gold, the motorcycle and the generator.

    Maroof’s second wife Shamira moved to the city with her two children and lives with her parents. Some of their old neighbours say they see Maroof once in a while in the crowded markets skinning sheep in Herat city.

    Khadija and her children, now ages 1 to 14, became homeless. She lives in a two-room shack that belongs to a cousin residing in Iran, with a charred kitchen and an outhouse toilet. The neighbours share the well and clay oven in her backyard. When her cousin returns, she will be homeless again.

    Khadija serves others now, making a sporadic 12 to 20 pence a day baking bread or washing clothes. The family barely has enough to eat. They have two outfits each, a pair of shoes and several headscarves. The husband of her oldest daughter, Rahima, has not shown up. Khadija is too afraid to wed her to another man in case the husband appears.

    Khadija is gaunt with a listless face. When she is not working, she sits motionless smoking her waterpipe; nearly all teeth are gone. She speaks with fatalistic absolutism: life and God have cursed her. Other widows cry as they tell their story and have a book’s worth of words to share out loud. Khadija’s words are sparse and her expressions unreadable.

    She loses her temper whenever the children fight or scream. She hits them with a two-foot, wooden stick she keeps on a window sill. Her life seems cliché to her, from riches to rags. “I only live hour by hour, wondering when the next meal is coming from, when are the smugglers going to take my daughters, is my husband ever going to come home. We have peace now but what good is this peace when my family may go hungry tomorrow.” she said, as she nursed her 1-year-old.

    GHORIAN’S SMUGGLING TRADITION

    A fierce wind cools Herat province in 40-degree summer temperatures. Some here believe that Herat, an oasis, will one day be destroyed by the wind. Genghis Khan razed it in the 13th century, but it came back to life two hundred years later as the cradle of art and culture in Central Asia. Today, the city and province of Herat form the wealthiest region in the country, thanks to customs revenues from goods coming through Iran. Yet Ghorian is a town on the edge of destruction – a slow, insidious haul.

    The wind blows harder here than anywhere in Herat, carrying the dust into the Ghorian River. Many Ghorian residents are ethnic Pashtuns, but nearly everyone speaks Dari, the language of Tajiks. Two decades ago, before the communists seized control, Ghorian was a bastion of smuggling for tea and fabric, but only small amounts of opium. Residents depended on agriculture and sheep herding to survive. During Afghanistan’s war against the Soviet-backed regime from 1978 to 1992, many of Ghorian’s men joined the resistance and hundreds of its families fled to Iran.

    The drug trade preys on lawless regions to flourish.

    Farmers in southern and eastern Afghanistan turned their wheat fields to poppy fields to make money and help fund the resistance. Ghorian’s nomads, with their history and tradition of smuggling, handled the opium trafficking to Iran. After the Soviet-backed regime fell, the refugees returned and the only jobs were in the drug trade. What was once a business for a select few families became a source of income for half of the district.

    Meanwhile, demand rose. Iran became a major consumer of Afghanistan’s opium with over a million addicts. So did Europe as heroin replaced cocaine as the drug of choice. Afghanistan is closer to Europe than Burma and Southeast Asia, where most of the opium was previously grown and exported.

    In 1995, the Taliban seized Herat province and encouraged poppy trade. They started to collect taxes from opium farmers and smugglers. At the same time, the drought killed 60 percent of Afghanistan’s livestock, destroying the shepherds’ livelihood. Many of these villagers had no skills or literacy. Even shopkeepers in the village market began selling opium. At first people in Ghorian did not know how to grow the crop. They were the traffickers until the Taliban brought their opium farmers from the south to teach Ghorian residents how to plant poppies.

    FARMERS

    “Jalal,” 18, just benefited from his first year of opium harvest. He learned from the Taliban how to turn his wheat and watermelon fields into poppy blossoms. His family’s half-acre yielded 20 kilos worth of raw opium this year.

    “My father asked me if I wanted a wife and a car,” Jalal said. “I said I want two cars. I now transport passengers for $20 roundtrip from Ghorian to Herat city. I had nothing, not even a bicycle last year. Now I feel rich and I have a job.”

    On the way to his best friend’s house, Jalal stopped to greet some men. One offered him eight kilos of opium for his car. Jalal eyed the station wagon’s steering wheel like a 5-year-old boy with a new toy. “I just got this and I can’t give it up for less than 10 kilos. Let’s talk later,” he said, accelerating.

    Jalal’s best friend is “Tarek,” a chubby moustachioed 23-year-old who manages dozens of acres of land belonging to families who live outside the country. This year, he planted opium on that land and now has enough money for his wedding. He bought a shiny Honda motorcycle and painted his mud brick house white.

    Over green tea, Tarek brought out his fresh batch of black opium, a bitter gooey liquid. “If you sell, you don’t use it. We have people test to see if it’s pure or not. They’re addicts,” Tarek said, tying the plastic bag filled with half a kilo of treasure and hiding it away.

    Jalal and Tarek say they are taking part in a Ghorian tradition, but unless they are desperate, they will not cross the border with drugs. “We deal here and hire the shepherds as our fall guys. This is the only way to stay alive and become rich,” Jalal said with a smug smile.

    Like two eagles taking off from a mountaintop, the best friends ride off on Tarek’s motorcycle, leaving a trail of dust.

    The boys like the new government since they have the contacts that others do not. Jalal says the district government sends a 6-member commission to view the cultivated land in the fall and asks for a kilo per acre. In exchange, the government does not destroy the farmers’ crops.

    Jalal sat in the office of the intelligence unit in the Ghorian police station with the assistant intelligence director.

    “I’m upset with your father,” the bearded official said. “He didn’t give me my share. I expect that share.”

    “I think my father gave enough this year,” Jalal replied under his breath.

    The conversation halted when Mohammad Sobhan, the intelligence chief of Ghorian, arrived. He offered to show videos of the government destroying opium crops.

    “When families don’t want to give a cut, the government eliminates their crop,” Jalal explained after he left the office.

    In the office, Sobhan admitted that the government is being soft on the drug lords for political reasons but denied any collaboration with farmers and smugglers. He said drug smugglers can escape to Zir Koh, a nearby district under a different government where criminals cannot be prosecuted. Officials simply do not have the manpower and weapons to fight traffickers, Sobhan conceded.

    Ghorian residents do not trust the government officials or the police. A crowd gathered around a fire burning hashish at the Ghorian fort, a landmark in Afghanistan that houses the district police station and prison. The police chief had just weeded out a handful of hashish plants from a local farm and was burning them in public to scare residents from farming drugs. It was show and tell and everyone seemed to know it. One of the bystanders whispered. “They probably kept most of it hidden in the fort to sell later.”

    GOVERNMENT LINK

    Despite their early support for the opium network, the Taliban banned opium production in 2000. Prices had dropped too low and they wanted to get rid of their stockpiles. All that changed when the American-led coalition drove out the militia three years ago and farmers took advantage of the power vacuum. President Hamid Karzai made the drug business illegal in January 2002, but the American-backed leader’s authority does not reach far beyond the capital.

    In Herat province, Ismail Khan is the warlord and self-proclaimed emir. He has an army of 20,000 soldiers backed by Iran. Karzai has tried several times to draw him out of the province to Kabul without success. Khan has prohibited the central Afghan anti-narcotics office to open a branch in his fiefdom, saying there is already a bureau operating under his control. Publicly, he condemns the drug trade and supports a treatment clinic for the booming number of addicts in western Afghanistan. If he is reaping the benefits of opium trafficking, the evidence is hard to find.

    Still suspicions remain. Despite the tight security in the region – Herat is the most peaceful province in Afghanistan – traffickers continue to cross the Afghan side of the border to Iran. Khan is said to dislike the Ghorian district. He is Tajik, while the Ghorian district is mostly Pashtun and has a reputation for revolt. Khan appointed a district mayor and police chief from elsewhere in Herat to strengthen the Tajik power in Ghorian. Last year, he had a Pashtun smuggler shot and killed.

    But even Khan cannot control the Ghorian district. Residents say Ghorian is an outcast in the province. “We don’t get any government help here because we’re the armpit of the province. We’re considered the smugglers and thieves,” said Dr. Gol Ahmed Daanish, who is the head of the hospital in Ghorian. “Unfortunately, smuggling is the only income that has been encouraged.”

    Daanish, delicate and polished in his western slacks and shirt, represents the small minority of educated residents fighting to change the district and its reputation. Several of the elite in Ghorian have formed a council and gather once a week to talk with the local government. They fight an uphill battle. The trend of trafficking has changed, Daanish said. “It was run by a few locals who are now dead or addicted. Now there are invisible drug mafias and bandits who control the trade and people here have become the pawns.”

    The most feared drug lords in Ghorian are cousins, Ruhollah and Kader, who live on the dirt road from Herat city to the town. Their twin two-story houses with manicured gardens and locked brass gates tower over the rows of walled-in, dilapidated mud homes. The cousins hail from a smaller village in the desert called Haft Chah (seven wells), which breeds drug dealers with important connections in Iran, townspeople in Ghorian say.

    Ruhollah and Kader are illiterate hajis – they made the obligatory trip to Mecca three years ago. Many Ghorian residents respect them for that title and their rise to affluence. They were shepherds, then refugees working construction jobs in Iran, and now they have carte blanche in the district as the leading drug lords. They’re the closest comparison to a mafia in Afghanistan. Their cronies terrorize women and families with opium debts.

    Yet even they have lost men to the drug business. Ruhollah supports his sister’s and brother’s family since their men died smuggling narcotics. The 35-year-old agreed to an interview under the condition that he will not talk about his smuggling activities but would give his opinions on the issue. “This route has belonged to smugglers since Afghanistan’s history. It’s not a shame or a crime. People here do it because they are hungry and hapless.”

    Inside his seven-bedroom, spotless house, the whispers of his wives and extended family echoed from behind closed doors. A jasmine scent of incense drifted in the room. Ruhollah sat on the gleaming Persian carpet next to his adopted daughter Soghra, 10, who sported sunglasses. Behind them were half a dozen vases with fake, colourful flowers and in the midst of the vases was a 14-inch picture frame of Ruhollah’s younger years, without the beard, turban and wrinkles he wears now.

    Ruhollah, sitting cross-legged and spitting tobacco, said he has everything in life that he could want, except for children. He has three young wives and is allowed to marry one more, but instead he has decided to travel to Pakistan for fertility treatment. He said his family made their money from sheep herding and money exchanges. They have a currency trade in the main market which serves as a front for their drug business, according to locals. Ruhollah said his fortune amounts to only £12,000. He has not had any problems with any change of government – he was friends with the Taliban and now he’s friends with the new Coalition-backed government. “My family’s able to adapt to government changes,” he said

    Ruhollah has taken over from the original opium trafficking family, the Soltanzi clan. The Soltanzis could travel the mountain and desert passes of the old Silk Road blindfolded and no one dared to stop them. But as Iran toughened its anti-drug laws, the clan lost its authority and income. Its women are now under Ruhollah’s power.

    In Shau Bibi Soltanzi’s three-room mud house, one room is locked. It has no windows. When the door creaks open, the light shines on a row of photographs nailed high on the wall. There is no carpet on the floor and the dust blows, fogging the view of the pictures. Shau Bibi introduced the people in the photographs. On the left was her husband Shahpoor and her son Qader, both executed in prison in Iran 11 years ago. Her oldest son Kader died in battle against the Soviets. Her son Nader was captured by the Iranians and has left her with a huge opium debt. Her other son Wahid is a drug addict on the streets of Iran.

    She did not put up pictures of her daughters, Bibi Shah and Gulaby, because it’s not proper to display women’s photos in Ghorian. But she brought her younger daughter Bibi Shah’s photo in a clear plastic bag with a death certificate from the local hospital. Bibi Shah was pronounced dead two years ago in her mother’s home from severe burns on her body. She poured cooking gas on herself and lit a match. The 17-year-old lived for two months moaning from her pains before she died.

    Health officials said there are two cases a week at Ghorian hospital of girls dousing themselves on fire with cooking gas. Only a few live.

    Bibi Shah’s husband was killed carting opium on the border. Her two brothers-in-law both wanted to marry her, according to tradition, but she refused. The in-laws accused her of wanting to remarry for a dowry. Her mother says her in-laws beat her until they tore her eardrum and locked her up in the house. They would not let her family see her. She kept a knife under her pillow when she slept, afraid that her brothers-in-law would rape her. One day, Bibi Shah lost complete hope.

    Her mother — left only with Gulaby, also a widow with two small sons — is losing her mind. She believes she is between 50 and 60 years old. As she sits on the floor weaving wool into yarn, she is not able to articulate a thought without changing subjects and time spans. Yet Shau Bibi is active and able to support the entire family.

    Shau Bibi and Gulaby borrow 60 pence to buy four kilos of wool, then they weave it into yarn used for carpets. It takes them 10 days to finish the job. They sell the yarn for £1. They spend 15 pence a day on expenses which include their daily diet of onions, bread, and dried yogurt curds. They have egg soup if their hens lay eggs. Shau Bibi in her chador and only tattered pair of shoes, searches for thorn and hay in the desert every morning. She makes a few pence selling them to the shepherds to use for food and fuel.

    Shau Bibi said as long as she can remember, her family transported opium. “We didn’t make much money in the old days. For a kilo the men took across the border, they got a sack of flour. Now the stakes are higher and so is the cost to your life,” she said. Her son Nader, 24, was a well-known dealer recognized for his ruthless behaviour. He sent the younger shepherds to the mountains and they died on the way. Shau Bibi wanted him to stop and convinced him to get engaged. The bride’s family demanded a £2,300 dowry. Nader made the dangerous trip to earn the dowry and pay off his debts. He was gone for three years when Shau Bibi received news that Iranians had caught him alive with three dead cohorts and three Kalashnikovs. Now she owed southern Afghan dealers and Ruhollah £4,600.

    “They were Taliban and they came and took the carpets, the motorcycle, the prayer rugs and the land. Haji Ruhollah sent his cronies and left me with nothing. And they’re still coming,” she said, weaving and weeping.

    Khan, the Herat governor, has announced that all opium debts are forgiven, but Shau Bibi’s debtors keep coming – some of the debtors are the police, she said.

    The women do not keep track of time. They have no clock or calendar in the house. But neighbours tell them when it’s Friday, the Islamic holy day, and Shau Bibi grabs her chador to go to the cemetery. A 10-minute walk from her house are several grave sites, mounds of stones, with no identification. She squats in front of two of her dead children, Bibi Shah and Kader the freedom fighter, and howls for 15 minutes. She wipes her tears on her dust-covered clothes and walks swiftly into the desert in search of thorns.

    Shau Bibi said she knows why the government will not imprison Ruhollah and Kader. “Everyone knows that these two terrorize and control Ghorian. Why do they not put them in jail?” she paused. The incoherent old woman suddenly became lucid. “Because they can’t. They have more money and power than Ismail Khan and Karzai. Or the government cannot survive without them and their money.”

    Ghorian’s story shows why the British and Americans have their work cut out for them.

    THE CHALLENGE FOR THE COALITION

    In a rare moment of bewilderment, US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told reporters on a visit to Kabul in September that he did not know how the United States would tackle Afghanistan’s demise into a drug state that provided funding to Coalition opponents. But critics say the Coalition is not concerned about drugs because US and British policy toward Afghanistan indirectly supports the drug trade.

    A US State Department official said the double standard to get rid of the opium trade and support the warlords who perpetuate it at the same time weakens any counter-narcotics efforts. “Catching terrorists is job number one. It’s at odds with stopping the drug trade.” The official added that it’s hard for the Coalition to minimize the warlords’ power and their profits from narcotics.

    Yet British Prime Minister Tony Blair has made a promise to contain the import of Afghan heroin. From April to June 2002, the British compensated farmers £200 an acre for eliminating their crops. Boxes of cash were flown into the eastern and southern part of the country and distributed to local authorities to hand out to farmers. Authorities ripped out the soil with their tools and tractors. About 4,500 acres of poppy harvest was destroyed. But many of the governors pocketed the money instead of giving it to the farmers and farmers continued to plant poppy, according to the Dutch-based Transnational Institute, which studies drugs in Afghanistan.

    The British defend the feat as an early opportunity to take action against Afghan opium cultivation. Despo Micheals, spokeswoman from the Foreign Commonwealth Office, said, “The UK provided £21.25million — this was a sound investment to help remove drugs worth billions of pounds.”

    The British also introduced a 10-year counter-narcotics strategy that includes law enforcement, alternative options for farmers and reduction of demand.

    Afghan farmers are open to alternatives, said Tom Brown, a consultant with the non-profit Central Asian Development Group, which works with drug farmers. “The idea is to find new markets for new crops like okra, and sell it,” he said. “The benefits may be less than opium in the short-term but in the long-term, farmers understand that it’s for the best.” The agency has tripled cotton production in Helmand province, with the help of US and British money.

    At the local level, new anti-drug laws have been passed. So far, the achievements of the new drug policy include a noticeable reduction in the southern poppy belt, according to Mirwais Yasini, director of Afghanistan’s anti-narcotics office. Karzai’s recent reshuffling of ministers and governors is also an effort to root out drug traders. But halting trafficking is the hardest challenge because its dynamics and criminal network are unknown to authorities, said Adam Bouloukos, deputy representative of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime. It’s nearly impossible to stop the problem from simply moving — more smugglers are now avoiding Iran and passing through the Central Asian country of Tajikistan because of its lax security.

    Iran tackles the low-level war on its border head on. It has lost at least 3,000 troops on the border fighting traffickers in the last 10 years. Iran recently placed 25 additional border patrols specially trained to rout out traffickers, in addition to the 100,000 troops already in place on the frontier. The traffickers say the troops shoot to kill. Iranian officials did not respond to numerous calls for comment.

    The 925-kilometer frontier of Iran and Afghanistan is a two-hour drive from Ghorian town through minefields and dirt roads. Signs of modernization make it clear which nation dominates.

    On the Afghan side, three sleepy-eyed guards came out of a bombed-out barrack. They eat bread and drink tea all day and sleep with the glow of a lantern as night falls. Each has a rifle in hand but they say they have no communication devices, no vehicle or binoculars. They have little power to fight armed traffickers.

    The guards deny working together with smugglers and say that this route is watched too carefully by Iranians for traffickers to pass through. In the last two years, they have only caught five men carrying 10 kilos in a sack on their backs.

    Two hundred yards away is the Iranian border post – a two-story building with armed guards standing on all four sides scouting the vast desert with binoculars. Beyond a large, bullet-holed, black stone and bushes of thorns is Iran and its paved roads and electricity poles. Parts of this border are divided by trenches and barbed wire. A wild wind howls, blowing debris from Iran to Afghanistan.

    The Afghan guards said they had a row recently because the Iranians shot sheep at night for crossing the black stone – the border mark. Their orders are to shoot anything that moves past the foot-long rock. “We told them that the sheep don’t understand borders and they are people’s livelihoods,” said Khan Mohammed, one of the Afghan soldiers. “They say they have to follow orders. They stick to the law and are scared to do anything without their superiors’ orders.”

    To establish contact with the Iranians, the Afghan guards went to the stone and shot two bullets in the air. One guard took off his army fatigue and twirled it around above his head. “If they get permission from their superiors, they come out in their truck. If not, we go back.” An Iranian guard emerged on the roof with binoculars and waved the Afghans away.

    THE TRAFFICKERS

    It’s a dangerous life for traffickers, as retired smuggler Nasim Siah knows. About seven years ago, Siah used to load up 10 men, each armed with a Kalashnikov, in his Nissan truck and head for the Iranian mountains carrying massive kilos of opium. From 21 of his closest trafficking allies in Ghorian, he is the only who is free and alive.

    Ghorian residents say the Siah brothers quit trafficking opium because they were losing money. Now they rob jewellery stores and money exchange shops. Siah discussed the smuggling business like a scientist eager to show off the latest invention. Siah’s “Great Adventures,” as he put it, into the drug business began with his desire for a woman. Siah, 32, wanted to marry a second wife. The father of the girl asked for a £7,000 dowry, and the opium trade was the fastest way to get it.

    Siah borrowed 1,500 kilos of opium from farmers in the south and took it to Iran. In two instances, other traffickers shot at them from afar and Siah turned onto unmarked trails to lose the gunmen. Many traffickers die in battles with other smugglers wanting to steal their dope, arms or money. Siah’s crew reached the mountain where the opium was to be unloaded, buried it underground and hid their vehicle behind trees. It took 30 days before their Iranian contact appeared at the bottom of the mountain.

    Iranian shepherds deliver messages between Afghan vendors and Iranian buyers and in return, take a cut of opium from both sides. The same shepherds serve as informants to the Iranian government.

    Siah considers himself lucky. He made it back to present the £7,000 to the girl’s father. His son, Sherzad, from that marriage sat next to his father proudly listening to how Siah used to traffic drugs. “I know more than a dozen girls sold to farmers in the south for opium debts and more than a thousand women who have been widowed,” Siah said.

    AZIZA’S FATE

    Under a searing July sun, 3,000 women gathered at the girls’ high school in Ghorian, where the district mayor gave a fiery speech on how they as mothers are responsible for keeping their sons and husbands out of the opium trade. Two girls, one dressed as a man, performed a skit about a mother who convinces her son to give up smuggling and addiction. Some of the women cried as they silently watched, tears of anguish and hope.

    For Aziza, the bartered child bride, the hope may be dim.

    Sufi, Aziza’s husband, says he does not want to force Aziza to come with him but she will eventually have to agree. “In our traditions, girls do not have the right to decide who they marry. It’s the father’s right and her father promised her to me. I will be patient but I am her husband.”

    She hunched next to me with her baby sister Karima in her arms and pleaded in my ear, “Please don’t let him take me.”

    Sufi did not look at her. He stared at his glass of tea and said he wants Aziza to become his first wife’s friend. “My wife is ill and needs help around the house. I expect this girl to help her but she is too unruly and rebellious right now. She needs to be trained and we hope in time, she will change.”

    “He wants me to become his slave,” she whispered.

    The next morning, the Ghorian police questioned Sufi on smuggling charges but they let him go after a two-hour interrogation. Khan’s government has banned bartering girls for opium debts but the couple has already been married under Islamic law, making it nearly impossible for an annulment under tribal values.

    I left Ghorian shortly after. I heard that Aziza came looking for me a week later. She had walked an hour barefoot against the wind seeking a saviour.

    “He has left but he swore to come back and take me. Can she make him go away. Please tell her to make him leave me alone,” Aziza told my hosts.

    I was long gone.

  • Return of the ‘good warlord’

    Ismail Khan seeks power in the new Afghanistan
    By Fariba Nawa
    November 21-27, 2001
    Village Voice

    Islamabad — Residents of Herat rejoiced-but kept their doubts-after Ismail Khan, their former governor and a Northern Alliance commander, captured this Afghan city from Taliban forces last week. Khan’s victory marked his return to a part of the country where he is considered a people’s hero.

    Many Afghans resent the alliance, a ragtag coalition that once pillaged the capital of Kabul, but they’re willing to give Khan a second chance. When the Tajik commander ruled Herat, from 1992 to 1995, some residents even called him the “good warlord.”

    “Young Heratis glorify him because he disarmed civilians,” said Fazul Rahim Ansari, a Herat merchant who fled the U.S. air attacks several weeks ago and is now a refugee living in Islamabad. “We could have picnics, play music, go to proper schools.”

    With the U.S. and its allies rushing to build a coalition government to replace the Taliban, experts say Khan will be a front-runner for a leadership post because his track record is cleaner and because he’s more tolerant than other commanders of the diverse ethnicities and of Pakistan. He has even expressed a willingness to make some accommodation for moderate members of the Taliban. “The Taliban are part of our nation. They have wives and children,” he said, speaking by satellite telephone. “I’m not interested in killing them. We need them because they are a part of us.”

    In the years following the decade-long war with the Soviet Union, opposition commanders like Ahmed Shah Massood and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar turned their forces against Kabul, shelling the capital and breeding hatred of the alliance. Khan, by contrast, set up a peaceful fiefdom and named himself emir of six western provinces. He built a university, paved roads, created jobs, and opened trade with Pakistan and Iran. He imposed moderate Islamic law, requiring women to cover their hair but allowing them to work and attend segregated schools. He and his officials dispensed justice at open-air hearings throughout the villages.

    Khan’s regime was popular but short-lived. After the Taliban captured Herat, Afghanistan’s cultural center, Khan fled his hometown for exile in Iran. In 1997, he returned, vowing to recapture the land he had lost. Instead, a local commander switched sides and handed him over to the Taliban. He spent nearly three years in prison, chained to a pipe, before escaping to Iran last year with the help of a loyal supporter. He returned from Iran in May to set up a base in the mountainous Ghor province to the east of Herat.

    Then came the U.S. bombers. With the air strikes having weakened his enemy, Khan was able to seize the neighboring Baghdis province before taking Herat. He said he now plans to move south, using negotiating tactics to bring Taliban commanders to his side. Already, he claims, 33 Taliban commanders and 840 of their soldiers from Baghdis province have joined his forces.

    Having captured Kabul, alliance forces are now looking toward the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar, some 300 miles down a main road from Herat. Kandahar has been home to the Islamic regime’s supreme leader, Mullah Mohammed Omar.

    Khan has in some ways operated outside the present conflict. Now 55, the veteran warlord known as the “Lion of Herat” has been careful to distance himself from the United States, which he said has not given him any military aid. But he hopes Washington has learned a lesson and will help reconstruct the nation after the fall of the Taliban. “We fought their war against the Soviets, and then they [the United States] abandoned us,” he said.

    Khan, however, seems more tolerant when discussing the Taliban. He argues that those who have not committed atrocities should be included in any future government and should join the loya jirga, the grand assembly being organized by the deposed king, Mohammad Zahir Shah, in Rome. “We can’t persuade all Afghans to believe in a coalition government without them,” he said.

    Despite Khan’s past as a relatively progressive leader, some Herat refugees in Pakistan have mixed feelings about another administration by the “good warlord.” They say Khan gradually lost touch with the populace as he became more preoccupied with the civil war in the rest of the country.

    The merchant Ansari, who says he will go back as soon as the roads are safe, hopes Khan “won’t make the same mistakes again.”

    Many Herat refugees say the mayor of Khan’s administration took bribes. They say officials collected money for electricity that never arrived and conscripted soldiers who often went unpaid. “We didn’t know how to feed our families,” said Nassar Ahmad, one of Khan’s former soldiers.

    “He lost our support after that.” And some are unsure whether he can once again bring peace to Herat. “We don’t know when Ismail Khan comes, what will happen,” said a former teacher and mother of four who asked not to be named. “Will it be safe? These mujahideen [of the Northern Alliance] are so divided, you can’t predict.”

    Abdulali Ahrary, an economics adviser during Khan’s administration who now lives in exile in Fremont, California, conceded that the warlord made mistakes but said he cares about Afghanistan more than any other alliance commander. “There was no law before he came and he had many challenges, not all of which he could overcome,” Ahrary said.

    The commander has tried to reassure those he would lead. When the war is over, the soft-spoken Khan says, he wants representative democracy on a national and local level with former king Zahir Shah reinstated as the figurehead. And if Herat residents vote Khan into power, he plans to build a top-rated university and establish shuras, councils of advisers, on such matters as politics, economics, and defense.

    “We are an educated and cultured people,” said Khan. “I want to see us shine.”

  • After Ibn Zuhur

    By Fariba Nawa
    October 2003
    POZ

    Before it was trashed amidst the U.S.-led invasion, this hospital outside Baghdad was both protector and prison for HIVers in Saddam’s Iraq. Have they been liberated — only to be left to die?

    Sari Zegum holds his mother’s hand loosely, gazing at the straw carpet in his family’s mud house. The 10 year old’s throat is too sore to speak. Hoarsely, he tries. “My neck and stomach” is all he can say, pointing. His belly protrudes like a malnourished baby’s, his ear is bent in half, and pinkish boils cover his face and arms.

    Sari is one of 73 people with HIV in Iraq, by the last count of the country’s AIDS Studies Center before U.S.-led troops invaded in April. The figure is likely higher, even though Saddam Hussein’s regime mandated that every border-crosser take an HIV test. Positive foreigners were turned away, while locals were moved to Ibn Zuhur hospital outside Baghdad, the nation’s single public AIDS facility. Some lived there; others dropped by for treatment; all got a monthly stipend roughly equal to $7, food rations and clothes. Wadah Hamed, MD, who heads the AIDS Studies Center, says the World Health Organization (WHO) also dispensed drugs, including AZT, ddI, ddC and Crixivan. It is widely believed, however, that the regime quarantined patients there, especially in the ’80s.

    We may never know the truth. Soon after troops marched into Baghdad, looters ransacked the hospital. The six resident patients, five of them prostitutes, vanished. Thieves took furniture, then everything from medical equipment to contaminated syringes. The few outpatients who still come around since the war are seen at a nearby TB hospital, but it’s overcrowded and understaffed. One can only wonder: In a country where chaos has replaced terror and where food, medicine and health care are even scarcer than before the war, does the ruin of Ibn Zuhur foretell HIV positive Iraqis’ liberation — or their demise?

    A FAMILY WAITS

    Three months after the U.S. declared victory, Baghdad is still hobbled. Water, electricity and phone service are spotty or nonexistent. Public demonstrations, forbidden by Saddam, occur daily. Two million civil servants are unemployed, many shouting “No to America, no to occupation!” in the streets. Coalition soldiers continue to die in skirmishes. English graffiti on a bombed-out government building blares, “Fix this corrupted ministry”—the same health ministry that built Ibn Zuhur.

    Sari Zegum spent two months there. He’s happier now at home, even if, at 32 pounds and three feet tall, he’s stopped growing. He lives with his eight siblings 40 minutes outside Baghdad. Green pastures surround the house, and the sick child often plays outside, amidst the family’s six cows and three shepherd dogs.

    The Zegums hide Sari’s diagnosis from neighbors, but they are open and deeply hospitable to foreign press, desperately hoping that publicity may save Sari’s life. “We don’t want money,” says his mother, Fatin Hamid Daud, 38, a confident, urban-raised woman with striking olive skin and striking sad eyes. She is the first wife of Sari’s father, Zegum; the second, Fazila, lives with them as well. “We want a cure for our child to be healthy again.” Two former Ibn Zuhur doctors who see him now at the TB hospital say he is taking AZT and ddC, but they need to get him a third drug to fight HIV, plus medicines to treat his oral thrush, skin infections and osteochondritis, a lack of blood to his joints that causes him severe pain.

    His father, 55-year-old Zegum, lost three fingers fighting in Iraq’s eight-year war with Iran and now does yardwork for meager cash; the family barely gets by with its farm and livestock. They have already spent $500—far beyond their means—for second and third opinions from private doctors, and then, once HIV was diagnosed, to get to and from Ibn Zuhur. But the boy has deteriorated rapidly. His decline seems unstoppable.

    Two years ago, Sari had severe diarrhea. His mother says a hospital doctor diagnosed anemia and injected new blood. Two months later, Sari developed a rash. Another blood test found HIV. “We didn’t think AIDS existed in Iraq,” his mother says.

    CONFLICTING ACCOUNTS

    HIV is a shameful secret here, believed to result only from promiscuity, gay sex or drug use. But 85 percent of PWAs are thought to have gotten it through blood products imported in the ’80s from France’s Merieux company. About 123 people with hemophilia received the bad blood, many passing it sexually to their spouses. Iraq has sued Merieux for $33 million, but the company, now Aventis Pasteur, denies all responsibility.

    Hamed also insists that no one who’s contracted HIV in Iraq in recent years can blame the blood bank, which he says has been clean for several years. He suggests that Sari likely got HIV at the barber, or when he was circumcised.

    The Zegums know little about AIDS. They often make Sari sleep outside, alone. His food is sometimes put in a separate bowl, and when he hugs his siblings, they pull away, afraid. Reminded that it is nearly impossible to get HIV from casual contact, they say, “You never know.”

    “He hates it when we separate him,” his mother says, tears filling her eyes. “How can I tell him not to hug and kiss us?”

    This afternoon, while Baghdad simmers, the Zegum home is mild and breezy. An electric fan hums overhead, and soothing Koranic recitations echo from a tiny stereo and TV set. The family spends little time indoors. All have duties: The women milk the cows, cook and clean. Zegum and his sons till the land. Only two of the children walk the 90 minutes to school.

    Sari is left to play, though doctors have warned him to rest. He and his siblings run barefoot, swim in the nearby canal and play soccer. Sari terrorizes his two cats. Those are his good days. When he’s in pain, more than half the time, he complains. He often cannot breathe well. He shakes in his sleep. “He gets nervous, leaves the house, hits his brothers and sisters and says he wants to kill himself,” his mother says.

    She takes him to the TB hospital whenever he declines, and he often improves there. But the two-hour trip is long and costly for the family, who rely on public transportation.

    Sari has been told he may die. His mother says he is mature for his years. But he won’t discuss his illness with strangers. He goes limp in his mother’s arms while she shows his deformities. “I pity him,” says his older sister, Sabrine. “I cry when he’s in pain. I wish he would get better or just die.”

    OLD THINKING, NEW REALITY

    The stipend and checkup for which HIVers reported to Ibn Zuhur on the fifth of each month under Saddam have become sporadic since the war. The WHO dispensed $28,000 for July, August and September installments, says its Faris Buni, MD. Hamed says that Iraq now intends to give patients roughly $10 a month for emergency goods.

    Most of the 244 people with AIDS first documented in Iraq in the late ’80s have died—but for the survivors, the scenario is bleak. Access to antiretrovirals and other key medications is spotty, as in Sari’s case. Hamed says many patients used to refuse HIV meds anyway, thinking they’d die regardless.

    As Ibn Zuhur’s patients have fled, health care professionals worry the virus will spread, especially through the prostitutes. Hamed says his staff is looking for them—and that he’s trying to meet with Iraq’s interim leadership about the matter.

    Under Saddam, schools and media offered no AIDS education. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) fought to get prevention information to community and health-care centers. But the Muslim nation, in which sex talk is taboo, permitted only abstinence instruction. Shoubo Rasheed, MD, who worked on the project, says UNICEF plans to introduce more explicit HIV education.

    According to Hamed, though, “Health education toward AIDS could create a disturbance in Iraq, because we don’t have a real problem, like we do with cholera or malaria.” He notes that Saddam’s regime HIV-tested 4,300 ostensibly high-risk Iraqis, mostly prostitutes, and none tested positive.

    But the two doctors now treating Sari say that Hamed embodies “the old Baathist way of thinking,” referring to Saddam’s ruling party, which routinely withheld the truth and punished or killed those who spoke it. Moreover, Iraq’s current instability and penetrable borders make it fertile ground for the spread of HIV. “Since there were so few cases, AIDS was swept under the carpet and largely ignored,” say the doctors, who withheld their names. “Now it’s the same faces running things in the ministry of health. If a new approach is not adopted, AIDS could go from 80 cases to thousands very quickly.”

    TWO WIDOWS

    The Palestinian caretaker Rouda Fahd Ali, 47, has lived beside Ibn Zuhur’s patients for 17 years. Plump and vociferous, the take-charge widow emanates Mother Teresa’s warmth. She feels more for the patients than perhaps anyone else does. But she has little to do these days, because most are missing or wait for their stipends at home.

    Ali has watched 40 patients die, some in her arms. “I’m doing this for God,” she says, sitting in her brother’s air-conditioned house. “I’m the only one who’s stayed with them since 1986. I’m their friend, their big sister, one of the few who comforts them.” She also paints a bright picture of their lives, calling them normal, independent and accepted by their families. Few lived at Ibn Zuhur, but she visited them and took them to shrines and picnics. Most come from poor parts of Baghdad and barely get by. A few are trying to open newsstands now.

    Before the coalition invaded, the patients enjoyed a safe community, Ali says. They could socialize and support one another; they were also encouraged to marry each other. One couple married at Ibn Zuhur and had a son—born HIV negative, Ali says, even though the mother hadn’t taken anti-transmission meds. The husband died two years later, and the woman returned to her hometown, near the Syrian border.

    Ali denies that patients were held at Ibn Zuhur. Upon arrival, she says, “they were hospitalized for three to four months and not allowed to leave. That was for checkups. After that, they could go wherever they wanted.” Yet it is hard to tell if she is lying—or to forget that, with Saddam still missing, many Iraqis fear he may return to power, and that those who spoke or acted against him in his absence may be punished.

    Since the war, some patients have told the Western press they were quarantined at Ibn Zuhur in the late 1980s. When they were finally released, some had nowhere to go. Others lived there part-time when they wanted to hide their obvious sickness from their neighbors.

    Nawal Muhammed (not her real name), 40, is a widow with HIV who still shows up for her provisions. She tested positive in 1994, soon after her husband died of AIDS-related typhoid, and has masked her status ever since. “The secret is killing me more than the disease,” she says. “But I cannot reveal the truth. No one will speak to my family if they find out.”

    Muhammed, an accountant, comes from a lower-middle-class Baghdad family. She looks healthy and stylish, with orange-painted nails and heavy makeup, and observes Islamic dress in a black head scarf. She is reluctant to speak in front of Ali at the TB hospital, where patients now come for treatment, but Ali won’t leave her side. Staffers scurry around, drowning out her gentle voice. Slowly, she opens up, unleashing her frustration and ambivalence toward her husband and her life.

    Muhammed’s husband and two of his brothers were born with hemophilia. They contracted the virus from blood products they received in the ’80s. But her husband wasn’t diagnosed with HIV until three years later. Muhammed tested negative then. “The police came in an ambulance and took him away to the hospital where they isolated him for three years,” she says, her gold wedding band still on her finger. “I was shocked. I didn’t know what had happened. I stayed with him off and on.”

    Over the years, the two had unprotected sex, even though they knew Muhammed could get HIV. They disliked condoms, she says. The couple had a girl and two boys—all HIV negative, Muhammed says—who are now 10, 13 and 16. Muhammed lives with them, plus three in-laws, in a modest house. The relationship with her in-laws, however, is tense.

    She and the children keep to one sparse room. Her husband, who was a taxi driver and bank teller, left them nothing. She supports the children with her HIVer’s stipend and salary of $25 a month. They try to lead normal lives: The children go to school daily and Muhammed works two days a week.

    A “DEN OF DEATH”

    Describing her misery, Muhammed quietly weeps. She’s healthy now, but every time she feels sick, she thinks it’s the end. She doesn’t take her medication because she believes it’s useless. Her children, who know of her illness, are her only reason for living, she says. She’s pleased they do well in school, but her teenage son is depressed. He has watched his father die, and now Muhammed can’t bear him to imagine her dead.

    “The day my husband died, I lost my dignity,” she says. “I lost everything.” Yet she also blames him for her illness and anguish. He should have left her, she says, when he learned he had AIDS. “I will die a martyr because I haven’t done anything wrong,” she adds. “I’m not afraid of death. I just don’t want my children to be orphans.”

    When Muhammed comes to Ibn Zuhur for her monthly provisions, she avoids the other patients with HIV and feels only gloom. She finishes the interview pensive and sad.

    Muhammed and Ali walk to Ibn Zuhur, a block away, to show the wreckage. What used to be a 250-bed facility with a garden and theater is now a pile of light-blue bricks. In front of press and hospital staff, looters pick away at wires and files strewn inside the halls. A truck stacked with rubble drives off.

    “They’re stealing the bricks to sell,” Ali yells, horrified.

    After the first looting, when only furniture was swiped, the French relief group Première Urgence planned to rehabilitate the hospital. But no one has protected it since, and now, three months later, there’s nothing left to renovate.

    The U.S.-led coalition has a military base four miles away. Some aid workers believe that heavy fighting in the area exposed both Ibn Zuhur and the TB hospital to depleted uranium, but there’s no conclusive evidence of radiation.

    “We told the soldiers that looters were looting,” says Estelle Langlais of Première Urgence, who visited the hospital several times. “They didn’t do anything about it.” Now the group is instead focusing on providing aid to the TB hospital.

    Muhammed kicks at the bricks, looking pleased. Asked if she’s happy the hospital was destroyed, she gazes at Ali fearlessly. “I have to be honest,” she says. “I’m so glad it’s gone. This was a den of death. Its destruction is my freedom.”

  • Reconstructing justice

    By Fariba Nawa
    July 17, 2003
    Mother Jones

    Clerical Shiite judges have stepped into the power vacuum in Baghdad. What will the new face of justice be in Iraq?

    Tucked away in an alley in the shadow of a centuries-old shrine in one of Baghdad’s Shiite neighborhoods, Sheikh Ra’id Saadi is performing an act for which he might have been executed three months ago.

    The long-bearded, turbaned cleric is holding court, playing judge, jury and prosecutor with the Koran and Hadith as his law books. He resolves family and land disputes, marries couples, and if obliged, punishes criminals in the rare comfort of an air-conditioned room.

    The US authorities here have promised to rebuild Iraq’s judiciary system, crippled by decades of corruption and long dominated by those loyal to Saddam Hussein. But Baghdad’s courts remain shuttered, and American officials say it will be months before they are open again. Throughout the capital, small Islamic courts like this one are filling the judicial vacuum. “The entire administrative system is in our hands now. I deal with 100 cases at a time. Even the Sunnis come to us for rulings,” Saadi says. “The Americans don’t have the authority to enter this courtroom. I’m the one in charge.” What remains to be seen is whether Saadi’s authority will last.

    Like everything else in Iraq these days, the judicial system is a work in progress, and nobody can quite agree on what the end result should be. Several prominent Shiite politicians have insisted that Sharia, or Islamic law, should form the foundation for both the government and the courts. Other factions, including the country’s top Shiite clerics, envision a system blending Islamic and secular laws, but keeping religion and government separate.

    The answer, of course, will be dictated by what US authorities are willing to accept. But while officials in Washington have insisted they will not accept an Islamic state like that in neighboring Iran, US officials in Baghdad are turning a blind eye to the proliferation of Sharia courts in the city. In fact, US officials don’t even want to talk about the issue — repeated requests for comment were declined.

    SECULAR COMPLAINTS, CLERICAL JUDGMENT

    One day last month, about 20 men crowded into Saadi’s makeshift courtroom, defendants and plaintiffs sitting across from each other on black wooden benches covered by green cloth. Saadi, in starched white tunic and clog shoes, sits between the two groups, writing out his rulings on a red plastic stool cluttered with papers.

    The dispute is over land. The plaintiffs claim the defendants have illegally taken over 650,000 square meters of property. They claim that Saddam Hussein’s infamous chief bodyguard, Abd Homoud, forced them off the land. Now that Homoud is gone, they want the land back. “There was a fish lake there and we had plants and date trees that were planted by my grandfather,” one of the plaintiffs says. The defendants, in turn, insist the land is theirs, that they bought it from another family, not the hated Abd Homoud.

    Soon, all the men are on their feet, screaming objections and pointing fingers. They all speak at the same time; one of the plaintiffs flashes a large, yellowed, torn paper, claiming it is a family map of the disputed land. Then, one of the defendants makes an accusation that inflames the already heated argument.

    “They went to the Americans to ask for help,” the man claims.

    “We certainly did not. We’re Muslims and we will solve this through Islam. We would never go to the occupiers,” Jasim Jaber Shaheen, one of the plaintiffs, fires back As emotions rise, it becomes clear that while the American officials aren’t welcome in Saadi’s court, the occupiers are still a constant presence.

    Saadi threatens to kick the men out of his court. Then, someone in the crowded room begins reciting a prayer. Each of the defendants and plaintiffs take up the verse, and the room becomes calm once more.

    Eventually, Saadi calls for an investigation into the issue. He tells the defendants and plaintiffs to accompany the court investigators as they tour the property, and instructs the men that they must produce witnesses to support their claims. The courtroom clears, the mollified adversaries going their separate ways.

    CIVIL LAW, ISLAMIC INFLUENCE

    Like every other Islamic judge in Iraq, Saadi is following the direction of the Hawza, the powerful religious school and center of Shiite learning located in the southern Iraqi city of Najaf. The spiritual leader of the Hawza, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, has declared that politics and religion should remain separate in Iraq, because politics corrupts religion. Not that al-Sistani wants to see Islam banished from Iraq’s courts altogether. Islamic law has always been incorporated into the country’s legal system. Even during Saddam Hussein’s rule, while clerical courts like Saadi’s were outlawed, civil laws remained rooted in Islamic teachings.

    The justice system being haltingly rebuilt in Najaf, the holiest city for the world’s 110 or 120 million Shiites, reflects that approach, with judges using a blend of Islamic and secular law. It also reflects the influence of the Americans now running Iraq, and the lasting impact of Saddam Hussein.

    Like Saadi, the judges in Najaf insist they are the ultimate legal authority in their courthouse. But, unlike in Baghdad, the Americans in Najaf are directly involved in the city’s courts. As in every other Iraqi city, American officials have insisted that civil institutions in Najaf undergo a process of “de-Baathification” — the term coined by American administrator L. Paul Bremer for ousting members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party establishment. But how do you wipe away the influence of three decades of Baathist rule? After a vote by courthouse staff — monitored by a US legal team — 50 of the 200 judges in Najaf lost their jobs. That purge evidently satisfied the US overseers. While the remaining judges had all practiced during Saddam’s rule, the courthouse was allowed to reopen.

    The US contingent in Najaf is settled a few miles from the city’s center, on the grounds of what was to be a university. Civil affairs officers Capt. Jim Rondeau and Sgt. Holly Malueg explain they are in Najaf to help the city’s residents rebuild their lives. And, like the city’s clerics, they insist they are only providing guidance to the court’s judges. But that guidance, it is clear, sometimes take the form of orders.

    “We’re insisting that they have documents before they throw someone in jail. Without documents, they were throwing 10-year-old boys in jail,” Rondeau says. “We had to release a lot of people.”

    The courthouse itself is hardly grand — particularly when compared to Najaf’s most prominent landmark. Just a few miles from the two-story court is the gold-domed, shimmering mosque where Ali, the fourth and last Islamic caliph and first Shiite imam, is buried. The mosque was left untouched by the looters who rampaged through Najaf’s streets in the days after Saddam Hussein’s regime collapsed. The courthouse was not. Documents, torn from court files, litter the building’s dusty halls. The walls show charring from recent fires, and the rooms are all but bare. There is no electricity to power fans or provide light, and the temperature inside the drab building quickly becomes stifling.

    Still, from 8:30 am to noon each weekday, the judges sit behind their desks, dressed in suits and ties, hearing the complaints of Najaf’s citizens. Black-clad women and men wearing long, loose shirts squat on the cement floor in the corridors, waiting their turn. Some of the men finger prayer beads as they smoke cigarettes.

    Bushra Muslim told this reporter in the halls of the courthouse that seven members of her husband’s family killed her husband, daughter and sister, and then stole the family’s money. Two were caught, she says, but five have escaped.

    “During Saddam’s time, those men would’ve gotten what they deserved. Now there’s no one to do anything,” she complains. It is a common grievance, but one that the judges and lawyers in Najaf’s court vigorously reject. They insist that crime is falling, and point to the new 200-cell jail, built by Americans and located next to the courthouse.

    “People’s lives are getting back to normal. Marriages are rising very high, from a few a day to 20 now. And that’s a sign that people have hope in their life,” says Judge Fawad Doud al-Alousi.

    But marriage laws are among the few largely untouched by the legal revolution taking place in Iraqi courts — because they fall under Islamic directives. Many other laws, particularly those adopted in the last three decades, have been called into doubt. Judges in Iraq have adopted the 1969 Iraqi constitution as their legal guide. Ra’id Johi, Najaf’s chief investigative judge, explains that the constitution, written after the 1968 Baathist coup but before Saddam seized control, melds secular and Islamic law.

    These days, the vast majority of the accused brought before Johi are facing weapons or robbery charges. For the most part, the punishments are far less harsh than they were while Saddam was in power — which is good news for Ali Abd Alim Jasim.

    The 33-year-old stands before Johi with one arm behind his back, refusing to meet the judge’s eyes. Iraqi police stopped Jasim at a gas station. When they searched his pickup, they found 30 AK-47 assault rifles. He tells Johi he has a license to keep the weapons.

    “Your honor, I was looted many times, so I carried those for defense,” he says.

    “Were you trying to free Iraq with these weapons,” Johi asks archly.

    Jasim then changes his story, saying he is a member of a political organization, and that the weapons belong to that group. Johi asks if US authorities have given permission for Jasim’s organization to have weapons. Jasim says he doesn’t know. Johi scribbles something on his carbon copy papers, and sends Jasim out on the streets, free but without his guns. Under Saddam, Jasim may have received up to five years in jail. Johi gives him one year probation. Johi has given him a break.

    “We’re more lenient because the circumstances are difficult now.”